Result of the resolution: Partially upheld
The complainant complained about the alleged disregard of the rights of suppression he had previously exercised before the Chief of Amer and the Chief of English (both dependent on the Institute of Healthcare). It is stated that the IAS has not responded to requests for data deletion made by the claimant before the Chief of Amer and the Chief of English within the established legal timeframe. And when the fund, the claim to protect the right of suppression made by the claimant in relation to the said requests is rejected, given that the application submitted to the head of Amer had already been met by the IAS, and as regards the request to delete data submitted to the head of English, it could not be carried out, given that not even five years had elapsed since the date of discharge of the first healthcare process.