Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is estimated because it is considered that the request contained in the submitted request would fit within the framework of an art access claim 15 of the RGPD, and was not given a formal response in these terms. The claimant had the right to receive a response from the person responsible for the treatment, even to indicate that he did not have the information requested. All of this, however, may have been required to amend his request by accrediting that he was acting on behalf of his son.