Using the relationship of parentage for a different purpose.

The Chief Inspector of the Urban Guard produced, within the framework of a penalty procedure for a traffic offence, a report stating that the person holding the denounced vehicle was the wife of the recurring (who was also an agent of the Urban Guard). The use of this data, which was known to the chief inspector of the Urban Guard because the complainant had designated his wife as a contact person in the event of a professional accident and by an internal audit for the alleged illegitimate use of the SIP in which the complainant would have accessed the information of the vehicle that had been reported, was not compatible with the purpose for which the personal data had been collected.