Publication in digital newspaper of the positive in of the mayor and of a town councilor of the Town Council.

The mayor of a Town Council complained that some of the members of the municipal group of the opposition|entrance examination would have spread that the mayor and a town councilor had faced|given in Covid-19. The diffusion|broadcast would have been carried out to|in a means digital and in social networks. The facts are filed with regard to the fact that the information about the positives for Covid-19 of the mayor and of the town councilor had kept on stretching for the people|village before taking place you denounce. On the other hand, that in spite of that the town councilors of the municipal group seems that they had had an active paper|role in the diffusion|broadcast of the information, it was not possible to determine that they had knowledge of the positive in Covid due to its|his|her|their public charge|post, nor the origin of the information that was published has been able to be established in the digital newspaper, and neither the origin of the information of publication of the town councilor in the WhatsApp of the club of reading. Therefore, in this case the presumption of innocence prevails.