Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
The complainant complained that the City Council had given a company a copy of some of his invoices -without his consent-, who in turn would have contributed them in a judicial process initiated against the complainant for pecuniary claim. The complaint was filed, as it was not inferred from the documentation provided by the City Council that he had communicated his data, and these were allegations without evidentiary support. In addition, all indications are that, if a communication of data had taken place, it would be covered by Article 7.f) of Directive 95/46 / EC, due to the concurrence of a legitimate interest.