Access to the shared clinical history and conservation of clinical history.

The archiving of the facts related to alleged improper access to the HC3 of the complainant is resolved, since they were justified accesses. Likewise, it is also resolved to archive the facts related to the lack of conservation of the clinical history since the EBA Centelles has provided sufficient elements that allow to verify that the information is preserved. Regarding the complaints of the complainant related, on the one hand, to the fact that the reported entity would have proceeded to modify its patient file by assigning a new doctor of the head the complainant, and on the other hand, to the fact that a doctor would have introduced false medical notes, the facts are filed because no violation of the principle of accuracy is observed.