Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally foreseen deadline|installment. As for the background|bottom, it is stated that the DPG has satisfied the law|right with respect to the diligences|proceedings of year 2012, and the claim in relation to the cancellation of the data related to the police diligences|proceedings of year 2017 is rejected, although this pronouncement is conditioned to|in the accreditation in the face of the Authority of having made the annotation related to the provisional stay decreed through firm interlocutory.