Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved because the answer of the Consortium was extemporaneous and not adjusted to the law of access. Likewise, him precise that the law of access of the LOPD includes the information related to the made or foreseen communications, but not the information related to the identification of the users who have accessed the clinical history.
Applied articles: Art. 15 LOPD and 27 RLOPD.