Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim of access to images is loved partially because although the town council answered -and to love- the request in the deadline of a month, the access did not make it cash in the 10 following days. Moreover, the Town Council did not give answer about the images of a camera that also the claimant referred to. Since some images cannot be facilitated for having canceled them, a judicial process in which the images could serve as test remembers that in this case its blockade proceeded to exist. Applied articles: art. 15 and 16.3 LOPD and 29 RLOPD