Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved because the organ responsible for file did not make the law|right of access effective in deadline|installment, and it only made it when having knowledge of the claim that it has caused the present performances|actions. Given the formulated allegations for the entity claimed in this resolution justify the reasons for which it is considered that the law|right of exercised|exerted access has to be conveyed for the LOPD and not by the Law of transparency, when referring to data of the requesting person (or its|his|her|their son, who he|she|it represents).
Applied articles|items: 15LOPD, 29, 30 RLOPD; art. 24.3 Law 19/2014.