Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved because the Department did not answer in an express way to the person affected about its|his|her|their request of cancellation. From an optics of sources|fountains it is concluded that the person has the right to the cancellation of data that figure in its|his|her|their report of staff, which would not be affected for a duty of conservation and would not be necessary for the purpose that had justified its|his|her|their collection.
Applied articles|items: Article|Item 4.5 and 16 LOPD and 33 RLOPD, Article|Item 9 of the Law 10/2001, of 13/7.