Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
The complainant complains that someone in Chief Manso would have disclosed his data (who is his family doctor to his ex-wife). RA is dictated as the ICS does not provide the complainant's data but merely informs the child's mother in common the reason why the child is not assigned the same doctor as her. The reason is that the child is a beneficiary of the parent's social security number and, by default, is assigned the same doctor/ssa as the cardholder. Therefore, with this information, you can guess who the complainant's doctor is. This fact does not constitute an infringement in respect of Article 6.1.h) in relation to Law 8/2007 regulating the functions of the ICS.In addition, information on the allocation of health professionals to beneficiaries is information easily accessible to any interested person.