RESOLUTION OF ARCHIVE of the Previous Information no. IP 131/2016, referring to the Institute of Secondary education (...) of (...)

The interception of electronic mail crossed between two teachers of a teaching institution, on the part of the director of the center, like this like posterior remission was denounced of the Post Office in other organs of the Department. The complaint is filed because, on the one hand, there is not any evidence of the interference in the mail, since the access would have facilitated one of the persons who took part in the communications. On the other hand, the posterior remission of the Post Office in the Department would be suitable, pertinent and non excessive, so that the art was not harmed. 4.1 of the LOPD.

Applied articles: Article 4.1 and 47 LOPD.