Transfusion of data through the Twitter social network.

One person reported that a squad flyer had sent messages via Twitter, stating that he knew that a city council had filed a disciplinary case for improper access to police databases (SIP), and blaming this city council for communicating this information to the fly. The complaint is filed for lack of proof of the reported facts, and for the fact that prior to sending the messages the controversial information had already been publicly disseminated, as it was thus stated as facts tested in a sanctioning resolution issued by the Authority in PS 47/20, preventing the commission of the facts from being attributed to the City Council, based on the principle of responsibility. In any case, since that sanctioning resolution was sanctioned by the City Council for having communicated this same information, it is considered that it would be disproportionate to sanction the City Council again for a new dissemination of the same information.