The catchment of the image and of the voice of the workers of the Town Council for a citizen requires, normally, the previous consent of the affected one. Even so, in some suppositions it can be understood that there would be a legitimate interest that could fit out this treatment, he regrets that the citizen complies with the principles and duties that the regulations impose to protection of data necessary. In the present case, the catchment of the image in order to identify the worker easily would be a disproportionate data processing. The recording of the voice would also be it in order to have evidence of the presentation of a writing in front of the Town Council or of the information requested to the Town Council. However, to record it in order to use it with occasion of the demand of responsibilities it can have habilitation in determinate suppositions.