The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
597 results were found
Access to the shared clinical history and conservation of clinical history.
IP 222/2021
The archiving of the facts related to alleged improper access to the HC3 of the complainant is resolved, since they were justified accesses. Likewise, it is also resolved to archive the facts related to the lack of conservation of the clinical history since the EBA Centelles has provided sufficient elements that allow to verify that the information is preserved. Regarding the complaints of the complainant related, on the one hand, to the fact that the reported entity would have proceeded to modify its patient file by assigning a new doctor of the head the complainant, and on the other hand, to the fact that a doctor would have introduced false medical notes, the facts are filed because no violation of the principle of accuracy is observed.
23/05/2023
Resolution of archiving prior information for unaccredited events.
IP 28/2023
Archived from the actions as it has not been accredited that the entity has opened an envelope with health data that was aimed at the complainant.
16/05/2023
Illicit processing of data.
IP 440/2022
It is necessary to apply the principle of presumption of innocence since the professional who attended and responded to the consultation of the complainant acted in the exercise of its functions and only treated the personal data that the same complainant provided him for the purpose of managing his query.
08/05/2023
Call her father's phone to report medical appointments.
IP 178/2022
RA is dictated on the reported facts related to the call made by the CSMA in Castelldefels, having tried to locate the patient in the telephone numbers that appeared in his file, coinciding with those that were in the RCA. And, as they were not operational, and in the face of the emergency, they chose to call the number that was included in the section of observations (of their mother) provided by the patient himself.
08/05/2023
Publication of the events that record the results of the chess tournaments organized by the FCE.
IP 55/2022
The complainant considered that, by publishing the results of the chess competitions, organised by the FCE, the participants' health data were disseminated and preserved whenever, to participate in the competition, the Passaport Covid-19 had to be exhibited. In this respect, information regarding whether a person is vaccinated or has suffered a disease constitutes health data in accordance with Article 4 of the GDPR. However, in this case, the ECF has argued sufficiently that, on the one hand, in order to comply with the legality in force, it should require the display of Passport Covid-19 to competition participants and, on the other hand, that there were people who displayed an antigen test, PCR or vaccination exemption document. In these circumstances, it cannot be claimed that the publication of the aforementioned acts allowed third parties to relate the persons identified to the acts, to the fact that they had been vaccinated against COVID-19, whenever, there were people who might not be vaccinated, and to have presented a PCR or an antigen test, and others who had a vaccination waiver document. For these reasons, the reported facts should be archived.
11/04/2023
File resolution. Publishing of the labor census.
IP 257/2022
The publication of the work census of the Col·legi d'Economistes de Catalunya, which included personal data (name, surnames, sex, DNI, seniority and professional category) of 21 people, relating to the electoral process for choosing the person representing the workers of the CEC, is denounced. It is also reported that the publication was made in a space accessible by people outside the CEC staff. It is archived because the processing has a legal basis and because it has not been proven that the census had been published in a place accessible to third parties.
11/04/2023
Revelation of the identity of the person requesting information before the GAIP, third parties affected by the access.
IP 480/2022
The complainant complained that, within the framework of the processing of a request for access to public information, the GAIP would have revealed to third parties affected by the access, their identity without the latter having requested it. However, in the pre-information phase initiated by this Authority, the complained entity has stated that, one of the persons affected by the access asked to know who was requesting controversial information. In this regard, in accordance with Article 62 RLTC, the GAIP considered, after consulting the applicant, that the submission of the application with its identity could be essential for the defense of the rights and interests held by the third party concerned. That being so, it should be noted that, consulted by the GAIP, the person here denouncing consented to the revelation of his identity. According to the above, therefore, the reported treatment was left open by Article 6.1(a) and c), in connection with the LLT and the LTTE, which is why the present actions are being closed.
11/04/2023
File resolution. Data disclosure to third parties.
IP 18/2022
The complaint is shelved because there is no rational indication of the reported facts. The complainant complained that the City Council would have disclosed its data to third parties, in relation to municipal charges.
11/04/2023
Resolution archiving a complaint about the data in electronic notifications of the Agency of Housing of Catalonia.
IP 7/2022
It is reported that a notification has been made as a natural person rather than as a representative of a legal person. The facts have not been proven to constitute an administrative infringement.
28/03/2023
Archiving the complaint about breaches of data protection regulations in video surveillance in the workplace and the lack of information about the purpose of the processing.
IP 127/2022
The complaint is shelved because there are no rational indications that the facts that have led to the initiation of the procedure have taken place. As regards the duty of information on the purpose of the treatment, compliance has been accredited.
21/03/2023
Total number of pages: 60