The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
118 results were found for your search terms VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
Recordings done by police forces, using mobile cameras.
IP 286/2021
The recording of images by police forces, without prior administrative authorisation, by mobile devices, is covered by the rules governing the collection of images on the public road. This rule states that such authorisation is not necessary in cases of the utmost urgency and if the circumstances in the case prevent the aforementioned authorisation from being obtained in time, a situation that occurred in the case under consideration.
12/07/2022
The right to information about traffic cameras.
IP 367/2021
Cameras installed for traffic control, regulation, surveillance and discipline are regulated by the specific regulation and, supplely, by the personal data protection regulation. The poster can be limited to reporting the existence of the camera or speed control device. Additional information on the processing of personal data must also be provided.
31/05/2022
Access your own data and images captured by a video surveillance camera located in the Consorial Building.
PT 22/2022
The right of access of the person is estimated by claiming their own data held by the City Council, including the images captured by the video surveillance camera located in the consistory building, and the right to access images and/or voices of third people that may appear in the reference camera recordings is dismissed.
17/05/2022
Installation of video surveillance cameras in municipal waste collection areas
CNS 4/2022
The current regulations do not give sufficient authorization to the City Council to install a video surveillance system in an open space that is part of the public road in order to control and, where appropriate, exercise the sanctioning power with respect to uncivil conduct related to waste disposal in collection areas. If the video surveillance system is installed in closed and delimited waste collection areas that do not involve the capture of the public road, the city council may be authorized for this treatment, without prejudice to the fact that it must also comply with the rest of the principles and obligations provided for in the regulations on the protection of personal data in the terms provided for in the RGPD, the LOPDGDD and Instruction 1/2009. A system of video surveillance on public roads in order to control acts of vandalism against public security could be considered legitimate from the point of view of data protection regulations if carried out by the local police in accordance with the principles and guarantees of the specific regulations of police video surveillance
10/03/2022
Recordings with cameras on the outside of a microweapon.
PS 50/2021
A city council is admonished as responsible for 4 infringements: 1) to capture images of the public track through cameras installed outside the micro-weapon, disproportionately (the public pathway was captured beyond what is required); 2) to use images captured for security purposes to identify the person who had not correctly deposited a residue; 3) Because the RAT does not include all prescriptive information and contains inaccurate information; and 4) To not fully inform the persons concerned.
01/02/2022
Responsible for the data processing derived from the installation of a system of video surveillance in the teaching institutions
CNS 43/2021
In accordance with the provisions of article 4.7 of the RGPD, the condition of person in charge of the video surveillance system in the teaching centers that formulate the consultation corresponds to the natural or legal person who has the capacity to decide on the implementation of the system, on the purpose of the same, and on the rest of characteristics and conditions in which the treatment is carried out.
23/09/2021
Contents of the informative poster of the existence of the cameras.
IP 126/2021
Was denounced that the informative poster of the existence of the camera or cameras|cameramen that he|she|it would have installed, it|he|she did not incorporate the information about the identity of the responsible for the treatment. Of the performances|actions, not even the existence of the cameras has proved that the poster had placed the denounced entity in the object location of complaint|denunciation, or either.
13/09/2021
that are not in .
IP 128/2021
The regulations of data protection do not result from application personal in the installed cameras, but that they have not entered in functioning|operation yet.
13/09/2021
Adequacy of a system of video surveillance to the regulations of data protection
CNS 42/2021
The data protection regulations do not give the City Council sufficient authorization to install a video surveillance system on public roads in order to control and, where appropriate, exercise the sanctioning power with respect to uncivil conduct relating to the dumping of waste. in the collection areas. In the event that the City Council installs a video surveillance system in closed and delimited waste collection areas, and not on public roads, it would be necessary to comply with the principles and guarantees of personal data protection regulations in the terms provided. in the RGPD, the LOPDGDD and Instruction 1/2009.
03/09/2021
IP 307/2020
of the images picked up by the cameras.
The impression|printing of the images picked up by the cameras of video surveillance picked up with until of security|certainty, in order to organize a device of security|certainty to protect a person employee who had been threatened by a user, it|he|she does not contravene the principle|beginning of limitation of the purpose. The archive|file is proper when the denounced entity accredits to make effective the law|right of information and to have appointed a DPD.
22/07/2021
Total number of pages: 12