The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
67 results were found for your search terms Image
Consent to engrave video of a delivery and revocation of the consent.
IP 172/2018
Requirements of the consent so that it|he|she serves as juridical basis of the treatment. The interested person has the right to withdrawing the consent in any moment, which entails the cessation in the treatment. If the interested person requests it, the responsible has to confirm the cessation.
28/11/2018
Diffusion of images and he sees in the Canal YouTube without having the consent of the progenitors.
PS 16/2018
The School published during an indeterminate time but at least, until February of year 2018, a series of videos that collected images and/or sees of minors, attracted during the concert of Christmas, without having the consent of its progenitors/him since in the model of authorization he did not specify the Canal You Tube that the data could also be published.
08/10/2018
Access of a police body to images of videovigilància picked up by the local police of a Town Council
CNS 28/2018
The communication of the images of which he orders the Local Police of the Town Council towards another police body when, in spite of not bringing a writ, he requests them in exercise of its functions of Judicial Policeman it constitutes a cession fitted out so much by the article 11.2.d) of the LOPD as for the LOPJ. This communication, in exercise of its competences on the subject of law and order, would also remain fitted out by the LOV as well as by the article 21 of the LOPD. In any case, the request has to fit to the principles of limitation of the purpose and minimization of data, requirement that is given, by the information of which it is ordered, in the examined case.
17/05/2018
- SECTORIAL AREA
- Public safety
- TRANSFER OR DISCLOSURE OF DATA
- Law enforcement authorities
- Judges and courts
- PERSONAL DATA
- Image
- ENTITIES
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- Local administration
- Council
- PRINCIPLES
- Purpose limitation principle
- Law-enforcement purposes
- Quality principle
- Accuracy
- Proportionality
- VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
system of videovigilància without informing, and that picks up excessive data.
PS 35/2017
To pick up images beyond what is indispensable to attain the purpose of pursued surveillance, is constitutive of a severe offense. Not to place informative posters in each of the main accesses to the plants of the buildings that count on cameras and not to provide to the affected persons information about the rest of foreseen points in the article 5.1 of the LOPD through forms, web or electronic headquarters, it is constitutive of an offense slight.
09/02/2018
System of cameras of videovigilància external to the dependences from an entity of private law of the public sector
PS 31/2017
To pick up images beyond what is indispensable to attain the purpose of pursued surveillance, is constitutive of a severe offense. Not to place necessary informative posters of the existence of the cameras to guarantee the knowledge for the affected persons, is constitutive of a slight offense.
26/01/2018
catchment of images on the public
27/2017
The commission of a severe offense is imputed in the Museum of Cultures of the World of the Town Council of Barcelona, to pick up images of the public way|railway without being unavoidable for the pursued purpose. It does not proceed to require the adoption of corrective measures because the Town Council has already corrected this situation.
21/12/2017
Utilization of individual cameras of engraving for the protection of the members of the Body of Rural Agents
CNS 44/2017
The collection of images and sounds from which physical persons can be identified, on the occasion of the collection of tests linked to complaints or certificates of inspection, it constitutes a treatment subjected to the LOPD, even if it cannot be qualified as videovigilància. Consequently, it will be subjected to the duties and duties established to the regulations of data protection. Regarding the use of videovigilància cameras for agents of the EXPENSIVE one in outer spaces to provide security to the performer agents in the face of possible aggressions or attempts of aggression, or in its functions at police judicial or of administrative police special, it would only be possible if counted, if it is proper, with the foreseen corresponding authorization in the regulations of videovigilància police. This would determine the terms in which the treatment, including, can be produced if it is proper, its incorporation in the Register of authorizations, and the terms in which it would be necessary to the affected persons to give information.
24/10/2017
Treatment of images picked up for system of videovigilància in police dependences.
IP 144/2017
The treatment of the images picked up for the cameras installed in the police dependences, as a consequence of the loss or subtraction of police documentation that is guarded there, fits to the purpose of security that motivated its collection. The designation of a person as a responsible for security is exigible in the files and treatments of level half and high.
22/09/2017
Right of information in placed cameras to police stations of the MMEE.
PS 9/2017
Not to inform of the existence of fixed video cameras installed in the police dependences in a clear and permanent way, harms the law of information and is constitutive of a slight offense. The interior and external cameras placed in the precincts of police stations of the PG-ME they regulate for its specific regulations (Decree 78/2010), but they are subjected to the foreseen sanctionative regime in the LOPD, and the APDCAT is competent to declare picked up with these cameras the eventual offenses with respect to the treatment of the images.
22/09/2017
Installation for individuals of videovigilància cameras in the façade of its houses
CNS 41/2017
With general character, the individuals would not have sufficient legal habilitation to install cameras of videovigilància in façades of houses that they collect and/or record the image of physical persons on the public way so that this catchment is not merely incidental with respect to the catchment of the property itself. In any case, the competent Authority to know of this supposition, and therefore to whom the inspection would correspond and, if it is proper, the sanction would be the AEPD.
18/09/2017
Total number of pages: 7