The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
67 results were found for your search terms Image
Installation of video surveillance cameras in the waste collection areas of the municipality
CNS 33/2021
The City Council could only capture images of individuals through video surveillance cameras on the islands of waste containers in the municipality in the event that the system is installed in delimited and enclosed spaces, other than public roads, on the basis of article 22 of the LOPDGDD and the competences of the municipality in matters of waste.
22/06/2021
Duty to the pupils of having the camera activated during the online classes
CNS 11/2021
Activation of the camera during online classes can generally be considered a lawful treatment, given the obligation of schools to ensure and ensure the educational function in relation to the students affected and the fulfillment of a mission in public interest (eg art. 6.1.e) RGPD), and the forecasts established by the health and education authorities in the context of a pandemic, without the need for the consent of those affected. In any case, the principle of proportionality must be taken into account. The Foundation may urge students to have the camera activated during the online class if necessary for its development, without prejudice to the possibility that the affected persons may exercise the right of opposition in view of their particular situation.
23/03/2021
Installation of video surveillance cameras in the municipal swimming pool, in the municipal sports hall and in the Castle
CNS 38/2020
The City Council could have a sufficient legal basis to carry out the processing of images through video surveillance cameras in the areas referred to in the consultation, given the provision of Article 6.1.e) of the GDPR, in connection with Article 22 of the LOPDGDD, if done in the terms of paragraphs 1 and 2 of that article. With regard to the procedure to be followed in order to consider the video surveillance system appropriate to the data protection regulations, it will be necessary to comply with the principles and obligations established in the data protection regulations (GDPR and LOPDGDD) and, if applicable, in the Instruction 1/2009.
30/11/2020
Prohibition against taking images of patients and health professionals through information posters
CNS 27/2020
It is in accordance with data protection rules to use clearly visible information posters detailing, in the terms that we consider most appropriate, that the collection and processing of data on healthcare workers and patients or their accompanying persons requires, as a general rule, their consent or other legal basis, as well as the obligation to comply with the obligations laid down in data protection regulations and the other legal order.
24/07/2020
Inclusion of images of people in an informative leaflet of the City Council
IP 328/2019
Personal data. The controversial images (in the event that the people who appear there were recognizable) would have served to illustrate, in a completely accessory way, an information, specifically, a program of events of the City Council, so there would be a basis that would legitimize the treatment.
11/06/2020
Image processing by police forces
IP 326/2019
The capture by the PG-ME of the image of a person when he went to the police station to testify in the framework of an investigation by the alleged commission of a crime of public disorder; and its subsequent inclusion in the certificate prepared by the PG-ME within the said investigation, is in accordance with the regulations. Case of exception of the right to information.
11/06/2020
Diffusion of sport events images in the web of the Town Council and to the social networks
CNS 16/2020
The diffusion of identified or identifiable images of physical persons who occupied a public charge or a profession of public projection, or of persons who turn up as merely accessory (especially in the event of images of persons under age), in events or public sport events organized by the Town Council, sufficient juridical basis (art. 6.1.e) could have RGPD), whenever the Town Council takes the considerations that expose themselves in this judgement into account.
15/05/2020
Publication of a book of commemoration with images of the school and the educational community
CNS 9/2020
The consent of the physical persons who at present are part of the educational community or who have been part,means a suitable and sufficient juridical basis for the publication of photographs of these persons in the commemorative book (art. 6.1 a) RGPD). Regarding photographs of identified physical persons or identifiable that are not part of the educational community any more, its publication in the commemorative book can find sufficient juridical basis in the article 6.1.f) RGPD, in connection with the HIM 1/1982, without having to have the consent of the ones affected, whenever the Foundation applies specific guarantees.
01/04/2020
Data processing as a result of the participation of a Town Council in a Project of European research
CNS 47/2019
This report analyses the content of the documentation provided on a European research project, in particular in relation to the following issues: determination of liability or, where appropriate, co-responsibility of the processing; The information flows provided; International data Transfers (TID); Security; The use of anonymous data or pseudonimization. With regard to the processing of images captured with cameras by the city Council, this, as responsible, must have a sufficient legal base and must ensure compliance with the rest of the requirements of the data protection regulations. It is also necessary to provide an informed consent in the terms of article 4.11, and inform those affected (art. 13 RGPD).
18/11/2019
Right of access to images of a minor son
The claim is loved upward from access because answer in the specified period was not given to the effect. As for the background|bottom, the town council has proved that the photographs in those that it|he|she referred|related to the applicant did not contain particulars as it|he|she does not allow the identification of the person not requesting even the represented minor, circumstance that would have been communicated already to the claimant, motive for which it is not necessary to make any requirement in this sense.
06/03/2019
Total number of pages: 7